Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We promote a clearer definition of vibrato(Seashore, 1932),based on a review of various vibrato features.We also propose a generalised vibrato effect generator that includes spectral envelope modulation,and a frequency-dependent hysteresis behaviour.We then investigate the influence of spectral envelope modulation on perceived quality with a double-blind randomized ABcomparison task.Eight participants listened to12pairs of sounds with vibrato matched for loudness.Each pair included one sound with constant average spectral envelope (identical amplitude modulation over all frequencies) and one with modulated spectral envelope (frequency dependent amplitude modulation).Participants were asked to choose which version sounded the most natural.The statistical analysis revealed a significant preference for sounds with modulated spectral envelope (p<0.001).Our results highlight the need to consider spectral envelope modulation for vibrato modelling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it