MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W130768465

Immigration Advertising and the Canadian Government's Policy for Prairie Development, 1896 to 1918

2004· article· en· W130768465 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationGovernment (linguistics)Public policyPolitical scienceAdvertisingBusinessLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation examines the literature produced by the Immigration Branch of the Canadian Department of the Interior from 1896 until the First World War. Immigration agents in the United States and Great Britain distributed these brochures, pamphlets and atlases to encourage farmers to settle in the Canadian West and the themes contained within these texts illustrate the ideological positions of Canada's immigration officials. In particular, they demonstrate that the ideal society envisioned by these bureaucrats consisted of young farm families. In the early years of Wilfiid Laurier's administration immigration became a top priority. This reflected both the upward trend in the world economy as well as a desire on the part of many Canadians to fill the Prairies with prosperous white families. As the government wanted only to recruit farm families they tailored their immigration propaganda to include themes which they hoped would appeal to young farmers and their wives in the United -States and Great Britain. This dissertation is based on a close analysis of these documents. Many of the topics included in Canada's immigration propaganda suggested that the Prairie West had tremendous agricultural potential. The authors wrote that western Canada could produce record amounts of wheat and that this grain was of such high quality that a bushel could expect to sell for record prices. In addition to describing the farms of the West, Canadian immigration officials attempted to inform their readers about the social conditions of Prairie life. In particular, they wrote that western Canada had churches, good schools, social clubs, and all of the other aspects of rural social life that immigrants knew from their homes in Great Britain and the United States. This dissertation ends with the conclusion of the First World War, as it was at this point that Canadian government changed the way that it approached immigration. The conclusions drawn in this work illustrate that Canada did not have a haphazard approach to immigration, but rather an organized, systematic view as to which settlers were best suited to the West. This is clear in the government's immigration literature, which is written to specifically appeal to young, prosperous farm families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it