A computational approach to custom data representation for hardware accelerators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis details the application of computational methods to the problem of determining custom data representations when building hardware accelerators for numerical computations. A majority of scientific applications which require hardware acceleration are implemented in IEEE-754 double precision. However, in many cases the error tolerance requirements of the application are much less than the accuracy which IEEE-754 double precision provides. By leveraging custom data representations, a more resource efficient hardware implementation arises thereby enabling greater parallelism and thus higher performance of the accelerator. The existing custom representation methods are unable to guarantee robust representations while at the same time adequately supporting ill-conditioned operators. Support for both of these scenarios is necessary for accelerating scientific calculations. To address this, we propose the use of a computational method based on Satisfiability-Modulo Theory (SMT). By capturing a calculation as a set of constraints, an SMT instance can be formulated which provides meaningful bounds even in the presence of ill-conditioned operators. At the same time, the analytical nature of SMT satisfies the need for robustness. Utilizing block vector arithmetic, our SMT approach is extended to provide scalability to large instances involving vector calculus which arise in scientific calculations. Atop this foundation, a unified error model is proposed which deals simultaneously with absolute and relative error, thereby providing the means of supporting both fixed-point and custom floating-point data types. Iterative algorithm analysis is leveraged to derive constraints for the SMT method. The application of the method to several scientific algorithms is discussed by way of case studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".