MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W136384337

A Kohonen-like decomposition method for the traveling salesman problem—KNIES_DECOMPOSE

2000· article· en· W136384337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTravelling salesman problemEuclidean geometryPartition (number theory)2-optHeuristicSelf-organizing mapComputer scienceMathematical optimizationBottleneck traveling salesman problemDecompositionArtificial neural networkTraveling purchaser problemEuclidean distanceMathematicsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceCombinatorics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to the classical heuristic algorithms of operations research there have also been several approaches based on artificial neural networks which solve the traveling salesman problem (TSP). Their efficiency, however, decreases as the problem size (number of cities) increases. An idea to reduce the complexity of a large-scale TSP instance is to decompose or partition it into smaller subproblems, which are easier to solve. In this paper we introduce an all-neural decomposition heuristic that is based on a recent self-organizing map called KNIES which has been successfully implemented in solving both the Euclidean TSP and the Euclidean Hamiltonian path problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it