MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W138341855 · doi:10.5070/d32010024232

Sweet syndrome with panniculitis, arthralgia, episcleritis, and neurologic involvement precipitated by antibiotics

2014· article· en· W138341855 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatology Online Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpiscleritisDermatologyDiscontinuationNitrofurantoinAntibioticsCiprofloxacinEtiologyHeadachesIsotretinoinSweet's syndromeScleritisSurgeryAcneInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Sweet syndrome is an uncommon skin condition, often idiopathic in origin although it may be reactive to various systemic conditions, recent infections, underlying malignancies, and medications. OBJECTIVE & METHOD: To present a case highlighting a rare clinical presentation and to review the causes of Sweet syndrome with an emphasis on drug-induced etiologies. RESULTS: We describe a 45-year-old woman who developed Sweet syndrome while receiving nitrofurantoin and ciprofloxacin for a urinary tract infection. Her course of disease was complicated by arthralgias, episcleritis, headaches, and erythema nodosum-like subcutaneous involvement. There was marked improvement with discontinuation of the inciting antibiotics and initiation of systemic steroids. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates Sweet syndrome related to nitrofurantoin and/or ciprofloxacin. This is the second report of Sweet syndrome related to these antibiotics and the first associated with ocular, joint, and neurologic involvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it