MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

El uso del español en el paisaje lingüístico de una pequeña ciudad canadiense

2013· article· es· W141018521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios de Lingüística Aplicada · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociolinguisticsVitalityEthnographyMulticulturalismGeographyPopulationEthnologyHumanitiesSociologyLinguisticsDemographyArtArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada the presence of one, other, or both of the official languages of the country implies the demographic presence of a particular ethnolinguistic group, either Anglophones or Francophones, in a specific region. However, Canada is also a multicultural country with a varied ethnolinguistic population where the presence or absence of a non-official language seems to reflect the strength or weakness of an ethnolinguistic group within the society (Landry & Bourhis, 1997; Huebner, 2006). With an ethnographic and sociolinguistics approach, this study shows that in Leamington, Ontario, there is a multilingual landscape and that the use of Spanish in different, but specific, domains manifests the existence of subjective ethnolinguistic vitality of a group, Mexican agricultural temporary workers, that has been institutionally discriminated and perceived as inexistent and socially invisible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it