Global perspectives on river conservation: science, policy and practice.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GEOGRAPHICAL OVERVIEW. River Conservation in the United States and Canada (J. Karr, et al.). River Conservation in Latin America and the Caribbean (C. Pringle, et al.). River Conservation in the European Community, Including Scandinavia (T. Iversen, et al.). River Conservation in central and eastern Europe (incorporating the European parts of the Russian Federation) (P.A. Khaiter et al) River Conservation in North Africa and the Middle East (M.J. Wishart et al) River Conservation in Central and Tropical Africa (N. Pacini et al) River Conservation in the Countries of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) (B.R. Davies et al) River Conservation in Madagascar (J. Benstead, et al.). River Conservation in the Indian sub-continent (B. Gopal et al) River Conservation in Central and Eastern Asia (L.Li et al) River Conservation in South-East Asia (D. Dudgeon, et al.). River Conservation in Australia and New Zealand (N. Schofield, et al.). CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. Introduction: Conservation, Ecosystem Use and Sustainability (J. Gardiner N. Perala-Gardiner). Geographical Settings: Global Disparities in River Conservation: 'First World' values and 'Third World' Realities (M.J. Wishart et al) River Conservation in Tropical Versus Temperate Latitudes (C. Pringle). Special Problems of Urban River Conservation: The Encroaching Megalopolis (K.E. Baer and C.M. Pringle) Key Constraints: River Size as a Factor in Conservation (E. Stanley A. Boulton). Problems and Constraints in Managing Rivers with Variable Flow Regimes (A.J. Boulton et al) A Biogeographical Approach to Interbasin Water Transfers: Implications for River Conservation (B.R. Davies et al) Conservation in Practice: The Role of Classification in the Conservation of Rivers (J.H. O'Keefe and M. Uys) Popular Participation in River Conservation (K.B. Showers) The Role of Legislation in River Conservation (C.G. Palmer et al) River Restoration in Developed Economies (G. Petts, et al.). Integrated Watershed Management for River Conservation: Perspectives from Experiences in Australia and the United States (B. Hooper R. Margerum). Indexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".