Bibliographic record
Abstract
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurologic disorder that was first described in the medical literature by T. Willis in 1672.[1,2] More than 250 years later, in 1945, Karl Ekbom applied the phrase “restless legs” to the syndrome.[3,4] Ekbom later wrote a paper on “growing pains” and “restless legs” and differentiated between them because growing pains were generally presumed to last only through childhood, whereas RLS had an early onset but was believed to persist into adulthood.[3–5] In 1960, Brenning noted that complaints of growing pains in children correlated with a higher risk of developing RLS-like symptoms as adults.[3,4] Primary RLS is believed to be an autosomal dominant disorder and, recently, scientists located a gene associated with RLS susceptibility on chromosome 12q for French-Canadian families, 14q for an Italian family, and 9p for 2 American families.[6,7] RLS is a sensory and motor disorder characterized by an uncontrollable sensation in the legs accompanied by an irresistible urge to move the legs, which usually results in partial or complete resolution immediately, albeit transiently.[7] There are many subtle variations of this disorder. To complicate matters, the diagnosis is purely clinical and thus depends on accurate historians to convey their subjective complaints. This poses a problem, especially in children. Consequently, RLS in children is believed to be underdiagnosed. Because primary care physicians typically comprise the frontline for the diagnosis and treatment of this disorder, accurate assessment by this physician population is critical. Children with RLS can present with conduct problems including aggression, inattention, hyperactivity, and daytime somnolence because of an inability to sleep or difficulty maintaining sleep. These symptoms may result from an associated periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD) or other problems such as aches and pains.[8] The consequences of RLS can be serious and include unsatisfactory performance in school, poor social development, and abnormal social interactions resulting in incorrect diagnoses of various psychiatric illnesses, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), among others. Readers are encouraged to respond to George Lundberg, MD, Editor of MedGenMed, for the editor's eyes only or for possible publication via email: ten.epacsdem@grebdnulg
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".