MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1430306388 · doi:10.17491/jgsi/2007/690302

Diamond Exploration in India: Retrospect and Prospect

2007· article· en· W1430306388 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society of India · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLustre (file system)PrideDiamondGeologyAncient historyLawHistoryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract India was the first country in the world to recognize diamond as the hardest mineral which could be used to polish and pierce holes even in the hardest rocks. Its use as a gem with a brilliant lustre came to be recognized later. Its fame spread all over the world by travelers like Pliney, Marco Polo, Nikitin, Nicolas Konti and others. The most famous of them was the French traveler Tavernier, who made six voyages to India, personally visited many mines in operation, collected diamonds and introduced them to Europe. Venetian cutters, who were expert gem cutters, enhanced their attraction by their brilliance and extraordinary lustre. It became the gem of royalty. With increasing demand from all parts of the world, Indian diamond industry reached its zenith in the 15th and 16th centuries. The very attraction of diamonds and their phenomenal value brought hordes of invaders whose only object was loot and plunder. A great country which was the pride of the East was ruined and its people reduced to poverty. With the fall of Indian royalty, the diamond industry became virtually dead, most of the mines abandoned, and today India does not find a place in the list of diamond producing countries. The Geological Survey of India was formed by the East India Company in 1851 and interest in diamonds was revived but when the geologists found that diamonds were distributed over large areas in river deltas, and were not concentrated in any particular rock, amenable for mining and for making quick profit, their interest dwindled and the position did not improve even after India gained independence. The development of India’s mineral wealth was never high on the agenda of the governments in power. Mineral surveys did continue but with lack of financial and organizational support ended up only with the discovery of few kimberlite pipes. Investigations were not pursued with the vigour needed to identify prospects, prove their economic viability and leading to the establishment of productive mines. Governments at the Central and State levels failed to realize that minerals are important in developing the country’s economy. Rest of the world, during the same period, made great advances. The source of diamond was traced and identified as a special type of a pipe rock at Kimberley in South Africa in 1870. The wealth produced from this mine spawned many mining industries and led to the discovery of new pipes in other parts of Africa. Great advances were made in kimberlite exploration. Basic research for locating diamond-bearing pipe rocks was given utmost importance. The new knowledge enabled opening up many parts of the world for development of the diamond industry, notably in Brazil, Australia, Russia and lately in Canada. All the advances in sister sciences like physics and chemistry were brought to shed new light on the characterization and identification of diamond-bearing rocks. New technologies developed, studies on diamond genesis and research vastly expanded, ranging from planetary studies of the solar system to geochemical studies of the deep mantle. India has yet to make a mark in these fields. The development of plate tectonics since 1970 and the idea of continents coming together to form supercontinents and separating more than once in the past, has opened up new areas for exploration. While previously kimberlite was known as the only source of diamond, there are now metamorphic diamonds formed along collision zones, and diamonds generated by impacts of planetary bodies. Advances in nano technology has made it possible to grow diamonds of even larger sizes under laboratory conditions. These are exciting new developments. There have been some significant discoveries of pipe rocks in India in recent years but their diamondiferous character and economic grade have yet to be established. A team of trained men well versed in new technology have to get busy in identifying economic prospects which can be developed into new mines. Proterozoic Cuddapah basin with its semicircular distribution of flows and the newly discovered fields of the Bastar craton have to be more intensely explored. There is urgent need for integrating knowledge gathered by geophysics with the findings of geologists and the inputs provided by geochemistry. Adequate and effective training, more intensive exploration, more selective targeting and purposeful effort may bring about a welcome revival of an old industry which at one time attracted the whole world. By its very nature diamond mining is an industry which requires large amount of risk capital where decisions have to be taken quickly. A highly bureaucratic governmental set-up is not conducive to significant progress. While diamond exploration has languished in India, the diamond cutting and polishing industry with a history extending to nearly 2000 years has continued to thrive. Nine out of ten diamonds marketed in the world today are cut and polished in India. The industry has to be modernized, with healthy living conditions provided to the large number of artisans. There is no reason why India should not regain its past glory of being the home of the most exquisite and brilliant gemstone of the world set in the most attractive forms of jewellery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it