La investigación histórico-social del diseño. Una aproximación metodológica para la comprensión de los significados de los objetos cotidianos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the last quarter of the 20th century, history of design as a discipline has promoted che study of objects from a socio-cultural point of view, by showing the existing relationships between the configuration of a product and ies production and consumption contexts. The article seeks to sketch a methodology to study everyday objects based on the analysis of social stories of design, writeen by authors such as Forty (1995) and Sparke (1986). This methodology, already applied in a course of History of Industrial Design at Universidad de Los Andes (Venezuela), offers an outline of essential questions to systematically assess the dilferent aspects of an object, such as its nature, configuration and use. Once employed, results show that the student feels involved in the research process and apprehends the existence of different ways of producing and using those objects, and develops his or her sensibility as well as the capacity of observation and critical attitude toward problems with other people and with his or her environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it