<i>Travel and Ethnology in the Renaissance: South India Through European Eyes, 1250-1625</i>. By Joan-Pau Rubies (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2000) 443 pp. $74.95
Bibliographic record
Abstract
January 01 2002 Travel and Ethnology in the Renaissance: South India Through European Eyes, 1250-1625 Travel and Ethnology in the Renaissance: South India Through European Eyes, 1250-1625. By Joan-PauRubies (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2000) 443 pp. $74.95 David Carment David Carment Carleton University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information David Carment Carleton University Online Issn: 1530-9169 Print Issn: 0022-1953 © 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the editors of The Journal of Interdisciplinary History2001 The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2002) 32 (3): 514. https://doi.org/10.1162/002219502753364713 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation David Carment; Travel and Ethnology in the Renaissance: South India Through European Eyes, 1250-1625. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2002; 32 (3): 514. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/002219502753364713 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll JournalsThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the editors of The Journal of Interdisciplinary History2001 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.070 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".