MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1479872974

Investigating Women's Antarctic Experiences: Some Methodological Reflections on a Qualitative, Feminist Project

2000· article· en· W1479872974 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicScience Education and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyNarrativeInterviewQualitative researchParticipant observationGender studiesInterpretation (philosophy)Subject (documents)Social scienceAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focusses on three methodological issues arising from the research: the impact of the subject position of the researcher in data gathering and interpretation, ethical aspects of the relationships between researcher and researched especially in participant observation, and the challenges this study presents to ways of narrating women's lives. The study involved women's experiences of living and working in Antarctica and their struggle to resist the discourses that maintain Antarctica as a male preserve.This paper arises from a research project on the ways in which women narrate their experiences of living and working in Antarctica.(1) In this study, I talked to women who had worked in Antarctica at one of four small isolated communities. The project was cast within a broad feminist qualitative methodological framework using long interviews. Halfway through the interviewing, I went to Antarctica for fieldwork for a different project which enabled me to undertake participant observation there and to experience Antarctic station life for myself. In this paper, I want to highlight some key issues and dilemmas which bear on the task of writing an account based on diverse individual narratives. In particular, I will consider the discourses that have been created to define the human presence in Antarctica and the ways in which my study disrupts these, some dilemmas in the conduct of the researcher, some ethical implications of the researcher-researched interactions, and the problems of creating a written narrative that is based on the different knowledges that result from such research into women's lived experience.Since women are considered latecomers to Antarctic work, I wanted to focus on women as a group in order to hear how they experience life there. There are many accounts by men, though the majority of these emphasize extraordinary adventures and incidents. Even most of the research with people in Antarctica, both physiological-medical and psychological, has only involved men.(2) The Antarctic has been constructed in literature, art and myth as a place for men, and in the eyes of many men, even today, women should not be there. They are there, but in limited numbers, and I wanted to see how they told their own stories.Women in Antarctica: enter late, in small numbersWhile the number of people who have travelled to Antarctica is still small, the last continent to be explored by human beings has long played a symbolic role in western imagination. A huge, uninhabited, icy wilderness, it beckoned to the intrepid voyagers while images of dread, and like the encounter in Coleridge's Rime of the Ancient Mariner, tantalized. The French, Norwegians, British, Americans and Australians played key roles in the discovery and exploration of Antarctica. The race to be first to reach the geographic South Pole in the first decade of the 20th century, and the ensuing expeditions, form part of a heroic literature that arises from the technological achievements and political environment of late colonialism (Pyne, 1987). The public narratives of the exploration of Antarctica exemplify the great men version of history, with their focus on the leaders and the exploits. Hardship and suffering provide a heroic dimension.Women first voyaged south in 1773 (Chipman, 1986, p. 18). The first woman to be allocated an official role, however, was a New Zealand nurse, G.L. Hammond, who spent the summer of 1945-6 on Campbell Island; and Edith Ronne, wife of the expedition leader, was appointed recorder on his 1947-8 Research Expedition. The first woman scientist to participate in an expedition was Marie V. Klenova, a marine geologist on board the Russian ship Ob based at Mirny in the summer of 1955-6. During International Geophysical Year (1957-8), two more Russian women scientists went to Antarctica. The Russian group included women as the stewards on their ships, though the two PanAm flight attendants who briefly landed at McMurdo that summer were paid more attention by the press. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.657
GPT teacher head0.635
Teacher spread0.023 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it