MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1485542559 · doi:10.7202/032209ar

Les relations parents-enfants dans un contexte d’immigration. Ce que nous savons et ce que nous devrions savoir

2007· article· fr· W1485542559 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté mentale au Québec · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsCentrale des Syndicats du QuébecQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationCriticismContext (archaeology)HumanitiesSociologySocial psychologyPsychologyEthnologyGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an overview of the actual and potential state of knowledge on parent-child relationships within the context of immigration. In addition, it examines the impact of parent-child relationships on the development of the child. The first part gives an update on empirical research carried out in that and an analysis of criticism by specialists in the field. The second half, which focuses on studies originating from disciplines other than child psychology, suggests approaches other than the simple intercultural comparison and underscores the true issue of immigration on family relationships, the complexity of the parental task with regard to immigration, its dynamic properties as well as the adaptation that is required. The author goes on to describe more specifically the role of the cultural and ecological contexts, the double cultural influence to which parents are exposed, the difficulties in relation with the transition and the attitudes of parents during the culture-learning process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it