MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1486143460

A novel strategy for cognitive radio networks with diversity and non-identical fading channels

2013· article· en· W1486143460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingCognitive radioNakagami distributionComputer scienceRelayFalse alarmBandwidth (computing)Channel (broadcasting)Diversity schemeCooperative diversityDiversity combiningComputer networkTelecommunicationsWirelessArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel approach for a relay-based cognitive radio (CR) networks with diversity and nonidentical Nakagami-m fading channels. Using a detect-amplify-and-forward (DAF) strategy, the approach aims to combat channel fading while mitigates the problem of bandwidth requirements of the well known amplify-and-forward (AF) strategy. We also introduce a statistical approach to derive new closed-form expressions for average detection probability and average false alarm probability. The study clearly reveals that DAF strategy outperforms AF strategy in all suggested scenarios. The study shows that with DAF strategy, refraining the heavily faded relays improves the detection accuracy while reducing the bandwidth requirement of the relaying links.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it