MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490285519

Canada’s Earthquakes: ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly’

2010· article· en· W1490285519 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
J. F. Cassidy, Garry C. Rogers, Maurice Lamontagne, S Halchuk, J Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismometerSeismologyGeographyHistoryHumanitiesGeologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Much of Canada is ‘earthquake country’. Tiny earthquakes (that can only be recorded by seismographs) happen every day. On average, earthquakes large enough to be felt occur every week in Canada, damaging earthquakes are years to decades apart, and some of the world’s largest earthquakes are typically separated by intervals of centuries. In this article, we provide details on the most significant earthquakes that have been recorded in, or near, Canada, including where and when they occurred, how they were felt, and the effects of those earthquakes. We also provide a brief review of how earthquakes are monitored across Canada and some recent earthquake hazard research. It is the results of this monitoring and research, which provide knowledge on earthquake hazard, that are incorporated into the National Building Code of Canada. This, in turn, will contribute to reduced property losses from future earthquakes across Canada. SOMMAIRE Un bonne partie du Canada est un ‘pays de seismes’. De petits seismes (que seuls les seismographes peuvent enregistrer) s’y produisent quotidiennement. En moyenne, un seisme assez fort pour qu’on le ressente s’y produit a intervalle d’une semaine; assez fort pour causer des dommages s’y produit a intervalle de quelques annees a quelques decennies; alors que l’intervalle de recurrence des plus grands seismes est de l’ordre des siecles. Dans le present article on trouvera des details sur les plus importants seismes s’etant produits sur ou a proximite du territoire canadien, incluant le lieu et le moment, leurs manifestations et leurs repercussions. On y decrit sommairement les moyens de detection deployes sur le territoire canadien ainsi que quelques-unes des recherches recentes sur les risques sismiques. Ce sont les resultats des efforts de surveillance et des recherches sur les tremblements de terre qui ont ete integres dans le Code national du bâtiment du Canada. Et cela aidera a amoindrir les repercussions des seismes a venir sur la propriete.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicSeismology and Earthquake StudiesFrench-language works237,207