Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2007, the poet Rhyll McMaster published her first novel, Feather Man, with a small publishing company, Brandi and Schlesinger, after six years of 'almost universal rejection from every Australian publisher and literary agent'.1 In that year Feather Man was shortlisted for the Vance Palmer Prize for Fiction in the Victorian Premier's Literary Awards. The following year, Marion Boyars Publishers published Feather Man in the UK, US and Canada. 2008 was also the year that Feather Man was shortlisted for the Australian Literary Society's Gold Medal for an outstanding literary work, and won the inaugural Barbara Jefferis Award as well as the UTS Glenda Adams Award for New Writing, NSW Premier's Literary Awards. One possible reason why such a powerful - and eventually successful - novel was rejected for so long by publishers and agents is the dark intensity of its subject matter. The novel is an intricate portrait of a young girl's struggle to grow up against the backdrop of an oppressive Brisbane in the 1950s. We are introduced to the character as 'Sooky' and McMaster pulls no punches about Sooky's situation. Feather Man opens with a scene of sexual abuse enacted upon a very young Sooky by her grandfatherly neighbour, Lionel. What follows is Sooky's painful journey in her search for meaning and identity in a world of fear and betrayal. The novelist Rosie Scott, one of the judges for the Barbara Jefferis prize, said that McMaster 'gives us a woman using all that grief to remake herself. Here is a story of a woman making it through.'2 McMaster, with a poet's sensitivity with language, weaves us an intricate tale of Sooky's triumph over her circumstances of place, time and events. 'Sooky' is a nickname bestowed upon the character by her father, 'because [she] was a girl'. In her father's world, being 'sooky', or sulky, is necessarily a feminine trait. We are told that 'when he was in a good mood he called [her] his popsy' (29). Sooky is called by a myriad of diminutive names throughout the novel such as Girlie, little fairy, Lady Muck, Lice, Sweetheart, Baby, Honey Heart, and Doll. The child-Sooky tells us that '[she] knew no-one used [her] real name because [she], too, didn't really exist.' (29). In Feather Man, names are powerful symbols of identity, for Sooky tells us that 'when you name something it becomes invested with substance, soul, that essence you look for in the eyes.' (291). Sooky's real name is alluded to throughout the book, but is not directly revealed until the penultimate chapter of the book, when the 'archaic' (245) name of 'Lyce' becomes 'quite unexceptional' (303) in a pedestrian event of a telephone call. In the novel's epigraph, McMaster summarises the Greek myth of Lyce and Daphnis, beginning with the line: 'The nymph, Lyce, made Daphnis swear eternal fidelity to her; otherwise, he would go blind.' Only when Sooky comes into her own existence can she lay claim to her real name and come into the full power of her Greek counterpart. There are four parts to Feather Man, the first being the longest at 22 chapters. Significantly, each part is titled with the name of each of the four men with whom Sooky has sexual relations. The first part, 'Lionel', details most of Sooky's childhood, although the narrative jumps back to her childhood throughout the novel, following the character's turn of mind. Sooky describes Lionel as 'big and authoritative' and Very powerful' (23). In relation to this 'royal beast' and 'king of the kids' (36), Sooky is 'a mere girl' (84) powerless to stop her abuser. The consequences of Lionel's sexual abuse in several instances are detailed as such in Sooky's words: Lionel robbed me of naturalness. He severed me from the right to grow up easily. He took from me the expectation of good things, and contentment. He stole the mundane, unexamined happiness of ordinary life. He took these with such greed, such selfindulgence and he took them, with a staggering lack of compassion, from a child. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".