MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1491540050

Visualizing causality in context using animation

2007· dissertation· en· W1491540050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Tools and Methods
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCausality (physics)Context (archaeology)AnimationComputer scienceData scienceComputer graphics (images)Human–computer interactionGeographyPhysicsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visualizing causality is one of the most difficult problems in information visualization. In particular, visualizing causal relations within existing representations (termed causal overlay) remains to be explored. The approach of a visual causal vector (VCV) holds promise as a perceptually efficient causal overlay technique. This thesis describes an empirical investigation of two initial issues of this technique: how to elicit and avoid causal impression and how to represent the strength of the causal effect. We examine the use of vector animation to produce the flow of causality and node animation to convey the strength of causal influence. The results of four experiments show that this approach has great potential to practically apply causal overlay and to form an initial basis for a set of principled guidelines for designing causal overlay visualizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it