MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1494327543

Wanted, a Beautiful Barmaid: Women Behind the Bar in New Zealand, 1830-1976

2013· article· en· W1494327543 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nadia Gush

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen's Studies Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural History and Identity Formation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislatureClubLawHistorySociologyPolitical scienceGender studiesMedia studiesMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WANTED, A BEAUTIFUL BARMAID: WOMEN BEHIND THE BAR IN NEW ZEALAND, 1830-1976 Susan Upton Wellington: Victoria University Press, 2013; 239pp. ISBN 978 0 86473 894 3Given New Zealanders' proclivity towards drinking, this investigation into the history of women and liquor regulation is a pertinent read. Beginning in the 1830s, Wanted, a beautiful barmaid, traces antagonism towards women behind the bar which climaxes in the abolition of the fairer sex from the profession in 1910. Far from a one-sided affair, the book also highlights the affec- tion a drinking community could have for 'their' barmaid, as was the case with publican Re- becca Tabor, elected as vice-president of her patrons' rugby club in Masterton. It is somewhere between these legislative restrictions and overly enthusiastic patrons, where Upton's barmaids and female publicans negotiated spaces in which they could support themselves and their fami- lies. The book also traces the slippery legislative slope leading to women's full reinstatement behind the bar in 1976, demonstrating that 'progress' in this case, was largely the removal of legislative restrictions that had always run counter to the preferences of the drinking communi- ties themselves.In a sense this is a well overdue book. It was 1997 when Diane Kirkby uncovered the story of women's work in pubs in Australia in her Barmaids: A history of women 's work in pubs. But Upton's work is not simply a New Zealand partner to Kirkby's, as its focus is far less on the role of the barmaid and drinking culture in the development of a national identity, and more on the legislative bombardment which confronted women seeking to support themselves and their fam- ilies through participation in the liquor trade. Upton's book is also able to situate the experiences of New Zealand barmaids within the international historiography, grounding the research at key points in a wider frame of reference extending to Kirkby's Australia, and also Canada. Upton po- sitions her narrative against other tomes of New Zealand women's history as well, thus not only uncovering the historical relationship between women, alcohol, and legislation in this country, but also contributing to the development of our understanding of New Zealand's position in the world and also women's position within New Zealand. Chapters cover the unrestricted grog shops of the mid-1800s, the feisty barmaids of the gold rushes of the 1860s and 1870s, the per- ceived moral threat the profession posed to women on the frontier, anti-barmaid campaigns led by the Women's Christian Temperance Union, the growing popularity of prohibition and its ef- fects on women in the liquor trade, the introduction of surveillance via the barmaids register, the war and six o'clock closing, and attempts by legislators and union alike to control barmaids dur- ing the 1960s and 1970s, respectively. Where drinking culture is considered a traditionally man's world, Upton's work usefully demonstrates that liquor is a women's history too.While the research for this social history was wide-ranging, personal accounts are often missing. We gain a brief and all the more valuable and rare insight into the personal letters of Ellen Piezzi, working near Hokitika from 1878-1881, but much of the early narrative is pre- sented from the outside looking in. Parliamentarians discuss working hours and the appropriate gender of drink-pouring, while criminal reports identify the bolshy women who participated in male bastions of New Zealand culture despite legislative restriction. A pair of barmaids wrote to the newspapers in 1884 decrying the slander thrown against them, and in 1910 Anne Carr and a handful of others engaged in correspondence with the Secretary of Labour concerning registration as barmaids, but these are small feminine voices in a much larger masculine wil- derness. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen's Studies JournalSame topicCultural History and Identity FormationFrench-language works237,207