Estudio ambiental sobre el riesgo ecológico que representa el plomo presente en el suelo / Environmental study on ecological lead risks in soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rev.esc.adm.negEn el contexto de la Ingeniería Ambiental es bien conocido que el plomo es un metal altamente tóxico que genera problemas graves para la salud humana. La Agencia de Protección Ambiental de los Estados Unidos, indica que una cantidad de 15 µg de plomo por litro, es preocupante, porque puede causar daño en el cerebro y el sistema nervioso. En algunos suelos de la Sabana de Bogotá, se han encontrado concentraciones altas de plomo, que en algunos casos superan los promedios mundiales. Este trabajo estudia qué parte del plomo contenido en el suelo podría introducirse en la cadena alimenticia, existiendo un riesgo ecológico potencial para el normal desarrollo de la flora, la fauna y en especial para la población humana que consume productos agrícolas cultivados en estos suelos. Se midieron las concentraciones de plomo en diferentes muestras de suelo y se encontró que aproximadamente el 27% del plomo contenido en los suelos tiene el riesgo de movilizarse fácilmente y afectar negativamente el ecosistema.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".