Electromagnetic whistler‐mode radiation from a dipole in the ionosphere
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dipole‐antenna radiation theory has been tested for electromagnetic whistler‐mode waves in the frequency range 0.1–1.3 MHz using data from the two‐point rocket experiment Observations of Electric‐field Distributions in the Ionospheric Plasma; a Unique Strategy (OEDIPUS) C. Waves were emitted from a double‐V dipole on a transmitting subpayload and received at a distance of about 1200 m on a similar dipole connected to a synchronized receiver. The magnitudes of transmitted signals predicted by a theory for short dipoles have been found to be in good agreement with observations. The agreement is very good in the top two thirds of the frequency range where the dispersion relation and the geometry provide only one saddle‐point solution with the required group direction. In this part of the parameter space studied, the transmitter‐receiver separation is at least 10 wavelengths. This is not always true at the lowest frequencies, where the expected effects of interference of multiple saddle‐point rays and of the oblique resonance cone are observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it