MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497850534 · doi:10.1111/sena.12092

Motherhood as<scp>A</scp>rmenianness: Expressions of Femininity in the Making of<scp>A</scp>rmenian National Identity

2014· article· en· W1497850534 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Ethnicity and Nationalism · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTurkey's Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemininityExpression (computer science)NationalismGender studiesEthnic groupNational identityIdentification (biology)Identity (music)GenocidePerceptionSociologyPsychologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceAestheticsArtAnthropologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article explores the discourses on gender roles and the place of A rmenian women in the A rmenian nation‐building process, especially focusing on the changes since the 1988 national movement formation. This study is based on extensive interviews conducted in A rmenia and K arabakh in 2011. Although A rmenian women were praised for their role during the nationalist movement of 1988 and the K arabakh war, they went back into their ‘traditional’ role in the aftermath. Motherhood is a strong concept in A rmenian women's (self‐)identification with their nation, constructing it as a unique A rmenian trait that distinguishes A rmenian women from ‘others’. The self‐expression of women highlights the authenticity of A rmenian constructions of femininity as motherhood, embedded in the national and ethnic self‐identification of A rmenian women. The concept of A rmenian motherhood is therefore a particular expression filtered through a distinct history of national struggle and genocide, and upheld by A rmenian women through that perception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it