Random effects mixture models for clustering electrical load series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For purposes such as rate setting and long‐term capacity planning, electrical utility companies are interested in dividing their customers into homogeneous groups or clusters in terms of the customers’ electricity demand profiles. Such demand profiles are typically represented byload series, long time series of daily or even hourly rates of energy consumption of individual customers. The high dimension and time series nature inherent in the load series render existing methods of clustering analysis ineffective. To handle the high dimension and to take advantage of the time‐series nature of load series, we introduce a class of mixture models for time series, the random effects mixture models, which are particularly useful for clustering the load series. The random effects mixture models are based on a hierarchical model for individual components. They employ highly flexible antedependence models to effectively capture the time‐series characteristics of the covariance of the load series. We present details on the construction of such mixture models and discuss a special Expectation‐maximization (EM) algorithm for their computation. We also apply these models to cluster the data set which had motivated this research, a set of 923 load series from BC Hydro, a crown utility company in British Columbia, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".