MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1501349457 · doi:10.1080/00150190108008498

Effect of ultra-violet irradiation on SrBi<sub>2</sub>Ta<sub>2</sub>O<sub>9</sub>thin film capacitors

2001· article· en· W1501349457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFerroelectrics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMemorial University of NewfoundlandNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaterials scienceCapacitorIrradiationPolarization (electrochemistry)TrappingThin filmOptoelectronicsVoltageCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Significant suppression of the switchable polarization of SrBi2Ta2O9(SBT) capacitors can be induced by ultra-violet irradiation, and the degradation in retained polarization is dependent upon the initial polarization states and the irradiation time. This can be well explained based on the model of weak pinning and mobility of domain walls. Furthermore, repeated cycling of the irradiated capacitor results in substantial recovery of the switchable polarization, and this recovery is applied voltage dependent. Experimental results indicate that the domain walls of SBT thin films can be weakly pinned by charge trapping and depinned by charge detrapping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it