Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract eXtreme Programming (XP) is a lightweight software development methodology based on the widely recognized and effective paradigms of code inspections, iterative spiral development, integrated product development teams (i.e., full‐time customer involvement), frequent builds, programmer teams (i.e., pair programming), design patterns, refactoring, coding standards, risk analysis, and regression testing. XP emerged from the object‐oriented programming community. XP is “extreme” in the sense that it diverges from “traditional” software development methodologies in several ways. In particular, it discourages documentation and encourages a willingness to throw code away. The XP approach to software development is targeted at systems with vague and changing requirements, a short delivery schedule, and limited resources. XP is based on four “values” that are assumed to be embraced by those participating in the software development process: Communication ; Simplicity ; Feedback ; and Courage .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it