MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507208036 · doi:10.1079/9780851995984.0203

Global changes, mangrove forests and implications for hazards along continental shorelines.

2002· book-chapter· en· W1507208036 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI Publishing eBooks · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Palm Production and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMangrovePopulationGeographyPopulation growthFlooding (psychology)Climate changeLand reclamationFlood mythEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental scienceEcologyOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coastal zones are becoming more hazardous due to increased population and greater susceptibility to flooding and salinization, as a result of compaction and subsidence, surface sealing and loss of buffer zones between the coast and settled areas. These conditions are exacerbated in the developing (largely equatorial) world, where rates of population increase are highest and protection schemes and mitigation strategies among the most poorly advanced. The major climate change threat to coastal forest environments is the projected increase in sea level and associated vulnerability of coastal land and inhabitants. In many places, existing coastal forests will be squeezed between rising sea levels and agricultural land, while farmers will have to contend with higher instances of damaging floods and increased salinity. The absence of adaptation strategies, such as the adoption of salt-tolerant crops and associated technologies, will force the abandonments of formerly productive land. Displacement of people will increase population pressures inland. The prognosis for forested coastlines in equatorial regions is poor and is unlikely to improve while coastal environments remain locations for the juxtaposition of dynamic natural environments with relatively static, ecologically disruptive, economic activities. Mangrove forests face the combined threat of global change-induced variations in environmental conditions and clearance and over-exploitation by humans. By degrading mangrove forests, however, humans will remove one of the few effective means of protecting coastal areas from the impacts of global change. Where removal of coastal forests proceeds along with the construction of new drainage channels and the canalization of existing rivers, impacts of flood surges and intrusions of saline water are likely to be felt sooner and over larger areas than on undisturbed coastal plains. Human activity may therefore enhance the possibility of catastrophic events in the future and, therefore, their own vulnerability to cumulative hazards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it