MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507352450 · doi:10.1002/9781118771952.ch23

Understanding Multimedia Multitasking in Educational Settings

2015· other· en· W1507352450 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Learning in Education
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman multitaskingMultimediaComputer sciencePsychologyCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter reviews the current research regarding multitasking with technology within the classroom with sensitivity to the distinction between on- and off-task use. It reviews recent research examining off-task (non-relevant) use of technology, which provides insight into the circumstances that lead to learning decrements when technology is used in the classroom. The chapter highlights the need to be sensitive to cultural or individual differences in the way that multitasking may occur. Multitasking challenges associated with learning, and in particular multimedia learning, are often explained through one of two cognitive educational theories: cognitive load theory and the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The opportunity to provide individualized learning environments that promote self regulated learning for every learner is one of the key reasons why technologies are so quickly being adopted in classroom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Learning in EducationFrench-language works237,207