MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1508506069 · doi:10.1002/0471654507.eme288

Neural Networks for Microwave Circuits

2005· other· en· W1508506069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of RF and Microwave Engineering · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowaveArtificial neural networkComputer scienceMicrowave engineeringAbstractionElectronic circuitElectronic engineeringMicrowave imagingArtificial intelligenceComputer architectureEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neural networks are information processing systems whose design was inspired by the studies of the ability of the human brain to learn from observations, and to generalize by abstraction. In the RF and microwave areas, neural networks are used to model passive and active microwave devices to enhance circuit design. Neural networks can be trained using measured or simulated microwave device data. The trained neural networks become models of microwave devices and can be used in place of CPU‐intensive EM/physics models to significantly speed up circuit design. Here we describe the fundamentals of neural networks from RF and microwave perspective. We describe what neural networks are, how to develop them, and how to use them in RF and microwave CAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it