Bibliographic record
Abstract
La révolution keynésienne a constitué une transformation majeure, tant sur le plan pratique que théorique, dans la plupart des pays industrialisés au xx e siècle. Le Canada est parfois considéré comme l’un des premiers pays à avoir appliqué des politiques explicitement keynésiennes. Ce texte examine les chemins par lesquels les idées de Keynes se sont imposées au Canada et au Québec, entre les années 1930 et le début des années 1960. Nous évoquerons d’abord l’influence qu’ont eue, sur l’implantation du keynésianisme au Canada, d’anciens étudiants de Keynes et d’autres intellectuels marqués par le nouveau libéralisme. Nous nous tournerons ensuite vers l’histoire du Québec, en soulignant les résistances qu’ont dû y rencontrer les partisans de l’interventionnisme, dont certains ont été initiés aux idées de Keynes à l’occasion de leurs études aux États-Unis, d’autres en Angleterre et en France, dans les années 1940 et 1950.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".