MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509794588 · doi:10.5555/1496770.1496898

A nearly linear time algorithm for the half integral parity disjoint paths packing problem

2009· article· en· W1509794588 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on Discrete Algorithms · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsDisjoint setsAckermann functionMathematicsTime complexityParity (physics)Binary logarithmVertex (graph theory)Discrete mathematicsApproximation algorithmInverseAlgorithmGraphPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the following problem, which is called the half integral parity disjoint paths packing problem.Input: A graph G, k pair of vertices (s1, t1), (s2, t2), ...,(sk, tk) in G (which are sometimes called terminals), and a parity li for each i with 1 ≤ i ≤ k, where li = 0 or 1.Output: Paths P1, ..., Pk in G such that Pi joins si and ti for i = 1, 2, ..., k and parity of length of the path Pi is li, i.e, if li = 0, then length of Pi is even, and if li = 1, then length of Pi is for i = 1, 2, ..., k.In addition, each vertex is on at most two of these paths.We present an O(mα(m, n) log n) algorithm for fixed k, where n, m are the number of vertices and the number of edges, respectively, and the function α(m, n) is the inverse of the Ackermann function (see by Tarjan [43]). This is the first polynomial time algorithm for this problem, and generalizes polynomial time algorithms by Kleinberg [23] and Kawarabayashi and Reed [20], respectively, for the half integral disjoint paths packing problem, i.e., without the parity requirement.As with the Robertson-Seymour algorithm to solve the k disjoint paths problem, in each iteration, we would like to either use a huge clique minor as a crossbar, or exploit the structure of graphs in which we cannot find such a Here, however, we must maintain the parity of the paths and can only use an odd clique minor. We must also describe the structure of those graphs in which we cannot find such a minor and discuss how to exploit it.We also have algorithms running in O(m(1 + e)) time for any e > 0 for this problem, if k is up to o(log log log n) for general graphs, up to o(log log n) for planar graphs, and up to o(log log n/g) for graphs on the surface, where g is Euler genus. Furthermore, if k is fixed, then we have linear time algorithms for the planar case and for the bounded genus case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it