MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509877075 · doi:10.1002/9781118985960.meh425

Pumps, Fans, Blowers, and Compressors

2015· other· en· W1509877075 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanical Engineers' Handbook · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGas compressorJet (fluid)Current (fluid)Fluid dynamicsInjectorSlurryWorking fluid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The continuous transport of a liquid requires a pump, and the continuous transport of a gas or vapor requires a fan, blower, or compressor. All of these devices are described by the general term fluid movers. Specialized fluid movers are required for the transport of liquid‐and‐gas mixtures and of slurries and suspensions of solids in liquid or gas. The vast majority are mechanically driven. A few eductors and ejectors use another fluid as the motive source This chapter is organized into two broad sections i.e.; on liquid transport and on gas transport, and within each section it describes the technology of both the dynamic and the positive‐displacement devices. In the case of gas compression, where pressure, volume, and temperature are all in flux, an outline of the relevant thermodynamics is provided. Dynamic devices include centrifugal, axial, mixed flow, and jet pumps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it