MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1510239352 · doi:10.1089/ees.2008.0345

Sustainable Development in Engineering: A Review of Principles and Definition of a Conceptual Framework

2009· review· en· W1510239352 on OpenAlexafffund
Bruno Gagnon, Roland Leduc, Luc Savard

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Engineering Science · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSustainability in Higher Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsSustainabilitySustainable developmentRelevance (law)Management scienceConceptual frameworkBiological systems engineeringSustainability scienceSocial sustainabilityComputer scienceRequirements engineeringEngineering ethicsEngineeringSystems engineeringConstruction engineeringSociologyPolitical scienceEcologyCivil engineering software

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article aims to provide engineers and the engineering community with a sustainability conceptual framework setting out the connections linking engineering projects to environmental and social systems. The main principles of sustainable development on the one hand and of sustainable engineering on the other hand are first reviewed, analyzed, and synthesized. Particular attention is paid to the principles put forward by international and national engineering organizations. Key issues emerging for sustainable development in general and sustainable engineering are identified through structured lists of principles. Second, concepts and models originating in natural and social sciences are outlined to shed more light on the ways the various aspects of sustainability are related. The conceptual framework we propose combines the reviewed concepts and models in a relevant manner for sustainable engineering. Engineering projects and physical or social systems prove to be related in manifold ways. Although the most common relations are exposed in the sustainability framework, others have to be further elaborated by eventual users to fully take into account the specificities of the various fields of engineering. Based in part on the framework, a novel systemic definition of sustainable development is also proposed. This definition brings forward a new perspective along which the relevance of the principles can be examined. Finally, applications of the sustainability framework in engineering practice and engineering education are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Engineering ScienceSame topicSustainability in Higher EducationFrench-language works237,207