An interactive system for recognizing hand drawn UML diagrams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diagrams are widely used by software engineers to capture the structure and organization of software systems. The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a commonly-used notation for such diagrams. We have designed and implemented a system for the on-line recognition of hand drawn UML diagrams. Input comes from an electronic whiteboard, a mouse, or a data tablet. A sophisticated segmentation algorithm groups pen strokes into symbols, coping with drawing inaccuracies that are common in hand drawn input. The system is organized around a retargetable kernel which provides a general front end for on-line recognition of any iconic notation. The kernel is extended with UML specific enhancements to segmentation, as well as UML specific glyph recognizers. A simple and intuitive graphical user interface allows the user to correct segmentation and recognition errors. Relatively messy freehand UML drawings are interpreted properly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it