MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1516769213 · doi:10.5070/g312910821

Review: Transportation in a Climate-Constrained World

2010· article· en· W1516769213 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Green Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Greenhouse gasWonderClimate changeKyoto ProtocolOperations researchHistoryEngineeringPhilosophyArchaeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review: Transportation in a Climate-Constrained World Andreas Schafer, John B. Heywood, Henry D. Jacoby, and Ian A. Waitz (Eds.) Reviewed by Yves Laberge Universite Laval, Canada Schafer, Andreas, Heywood, John B., Jacoby, Henry D. and Waitz, Ian A. (Eds.). Transportation in a Climate-Constrained World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009. xiii + 340 pp. ISBN: 9780262512343. US$27.00, paper. Alkaline paper. Whatever drivers think and wonder when they are stuck in their daily traffic jam, this rigorous book provides the answers! Addressing the costs of fuel and pollution, Transportation in a Climate-Constrained World is a detailed and precise demonstration about the possible consequences of overusing car transportation in our cities. In the (unsigned) preface, we are told that this book is the first attempt to systematically integrate the various factors affecting GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions for all major modes of passenger transport on a U.S. and global scale (p.vii). While countries in the European Union are imposing policies in order to meet the targets of the Kyoto Protocol, the U.S. does not (p.18). Therefore, the authors propose various solutions and strategies but, being aware of how difficult changes for less can be in a context of growing demand for travel, they review the structural challenges that face the policy approaches that would be required to overcome them (p.18). Even though the authors focus on the U.S., other countries are mentioned here and there. Oddly, the first two chapters are perhaps the most demanding, mainly because they carry an impressive amount of data, formulas, and figures (that sociologists, economists and statisticians will surely appreciate). However, they are prerequisites for this admirable reflection about the various ways to reduce our energy consumption, energy efficiency, increasing levels of traffic congestion (p.52), with examples of transportation substitutes like telecommunications at work through electronic commerce (p.57). Perhaps the most stimulating, chapter 4 focuses on the new vehicle technologies like hybrid and electric cars, asking for example if more energy efficient engines would be worth their higher cost, and comparing their potential prices (p.122). Chapter 5 raises questions about how to improve the efficiency of aircraft propulsion, providing numbers and possible strategies for travelers. Chapter 6 investigates alternative energies, unconventional oil, compressed natural gas, hydrogen, questioning their potential for large-scale application (p.220). New technologies already exist, but without public policy to support these improvements, their cost will limit their contribution to controlling ever-rising GHG emissions (p. 221). Finally, chapters 7 and 8 suggest some possible and perhaps inevitable choices in future policies: less car users, more public transportation, and more insensitive from governments. Another issue that could also be discussed would be urban planning: are cities now too big? I liked this book. In many passages, the authors succeeded by putting their finger on some social problems that have limited our strategies to reduce energy consumption: the rising share of urban travel (p.84), the limited consumer reaction to changing fuel prices (p.85), or the passenger response to changes in airline fares, depending if these moves are for leisure or business trips (p.96). Their style is sometimes complex, but at other moments light or concise, for example when they use the horse carriage metaphor in order to explain today's emissions and pollution emerging from cars (and previously from horses) (p.2). However, contrary to what the authors argued in their preface and despite its numerous qualities, I am not sure this dense book would be relevant or accessible for a general audience (p.vii). But on the other hand, I believe Transportation in a Climate-Constrained World will be very instructive for scholars in governance and public policy, but as well for environmentalists, social scientists, policymakers, and advanced undergraduates. Yves Laberge, PhD. , Departement de sociologie, 3469 Pavillon Charles-De Koninck, Universite Laval, Quebec City, Canada. Electronic Green Journal, Issue 29, Winter 2009, ISSN:1076-7975

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it