MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517258173 · doi:10.20382/jocg.v5i1a14

Incidences with $k$-non-degenerate sets and their applications

2013· article· en· W1517258173 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Geometry (Carleton University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsDegenerate energy levelsUpper and lower boundsPlane (geometry)PolynomialDegree (music)Space (punctuation)Set (abstract data type)Discrete mathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study point-sphere and point-plane incidences in the three-dimensional space. In particular, for $1 < k < n$, we say that a set of spheres (resp., of planes) is $k$-non-degenerate if no circle is contained in $k$ spheres of the set (resp., if no line is contained in $k$ planes of the set). We prove that, for every $\varepsilon>0$, the number of incidences between a set of $m$ points and a $k$-non-degenerate set of $n$ spheres is \[ O(m^{3/4+\varepsilon}n^{3/4}k^{1/4}+n+mk).\] Similarly, we prove that, for every $\varepsilon>0$, the number of incidences between a set of $m$ points and a $k$-non-degenerate set of $n$ planes is \[ O(m^{4/5+\varepsilon}n^{3/5}k^{2/5} + n + mk). \] These bounds are obtained by using the polynomial partitioning technique, recently introduced by Guth and Katz. More specifically, in our proofs we use a pair of constant-degree partitioning polynomials. We also present a couple of applications of $k$-non-degenerate sets: (i) We consider an extension of the three-dimensional unit distances problem, in which we are given a set $D$ of $k$ distinct distances and ask for a three-dimensional set of $m$ points that maximizes the number of pairs of points that span a distance from $D$. By relying on $k$-non-degenerate sets of spheres, we prove an upper bound of $O(m^{236/149+\varepsilon}k^{125/149})$ for the problem (which improves the trivial bound for large values of $k$). Â Â Â (ii) We consider the maximum number of incidences between a three-dimensional set of $n$ planes (without any restrictions) and a set of $m$ points, such that no $k$ points are collinear. Our bound for $k$-non-degenerate planes immediately implies a bound of $O(n^{4/5+\varepsilon}m^{3/5}k^{2/5} + m + nk)$ for this problem, generalizing the previous bound $O(n^{4/5}m^{3/5} + n\log m)$ for the specific case where no three points are collinear (up to the $\varepsilon$ in the exponent).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it