MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1519261503 · doi:10.3233/hsn-2000-185

Resource management issues in future wireless multimedia networks

2000· article· en· W1519261503 on OpenAlexaff
Youssef Iraqi, Raouf Boutaba

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Speed Networks · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultimediaWirelessWireless networkResource (disambiguation)Computer networkResource management (computing)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Broadband multimedia services and wireless services are becoming very popular. They are presently the two major drivers in the telecommunication industry. It is expected that wireless mobile users' demands for multimedia mobile services will rapidly increase in the future. The paper starts by presenting the evolution of wireless networks to support future integrated multimedia wireless personal services and highlight the need for efficient resource management. The limited resources in wireless systems, such as spectrum resource and transmitter power also stress the need for efficient resource management. Emphasis is given in the paper to the discussion of the channel allocation, mobility management, and bandwidth distribution problems. A review of some approaches proposed in the literature to solve these problems is presented. Finally, the paper discusses some of the key resource management issues that need to be addressed in the context of future wireless mobile networks that support multimedia communications while ensuring quality of service guarantees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of High Speed NetworksSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207