MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1519984783 · doi:10.3138/jcs.38.1.23

The Two Giovannis: P.K. Page’s Two Modernisms

2004· article· en· W1519984783 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Dean Irvine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsPoetryLiteratureModernism (music)History of literatureFree verseHistoryArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although P.K. Page published more of her poetry in the west-coast poetry magazine Contemporary Verse (1941-1953) than any other modernist periodical, critics and literary historians have primarily attended to her early affiliations with the Preview (1942-1945) group in Montreal. By shifting attention from her Preview period to her long-term involvement with the Contemporary Verse group, this study moves towards a reconfiguration of critical and literary-historical perspectives on the relationships among modernist poetics, gender, and little-magazine production that inform Page’s participation in Canadian modernist literary culture from the early 1950s to the mid-1950s. With the publication of her two “Giovanni” poems (“Giovanni and the Indians” and “After Rain”) in 1956 as its terminal points, this reconfigured history attends to the doubly-gendered contexts of Page’s modernist poetry and poetics, namely the sociality of gender in modernist little-magazine culture and the gender of her two modernisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.019
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicPoetry Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207