MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1521027238 · doi:10.4271/2006-01-1984

A Passive Nonlinear Damping Design for a Road Race Car Application

2006· article· en· W1521027238 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemRace (biology)Computer scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringPhysicsSociologyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A suspension system does not merely isolate a vehicle from the shocks and vibrations induced by the road surface. It also keeps the wheels in contact with the road, ensuring vehicle stability and control. In order to properly determine the stiffness and damping parameters of a Formula SAE, models for a quarter car and a seven degree-of-freedom car (DOF-7) were developed based upon Newton’s second law. These were built using MatLab/Simulink. The quarter car model was taken first, to study the effect of four (4) suspension parameters on the tires’ vertical load fluctuations. The results were then used to optimize suspension parameters for the 7-DOF model, taking the bounce, roll and pitch motions of the chassis into account in addition to its four-wheel hops. Track data was acquired and used as input to the model. Nonlinear damping was implemented in the 7-DOF model to study the car’s behavior. The simulation results show that very high damping helps control the slow motions of the chassis, while at higher wheel hop speeds, a low damping ratio minimizes the tires’ vertical load fluctuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it