MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522886583 · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub57.2ed

Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect

2009· book· en· W1522886583 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSSA special publication series · 2009
Typebook
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon sequestrationGreenhouseEnvironmental scienceSoil carbonCarbon fibersGreenhouse gasGreenhouse effectSoil scienceNatural resource economicsSoil waterGeologyAgronomyClimate changeGlobal warmingCarbon dioxideEcologyEconomicsComputer scienceOceanographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It’s hard to believe that the Greenhouse Effect is a concept that is now more than a century old, but today the observed and predicted climate changes attributed to the anthropogenic increases in atmospheric CO2 more urgently repeat the question, what can be done? The strategy of soil carbon sequestration is gaining importance because of the growing need to offset the rapidly increasing atmospheric concentration of CO2. The term soil carbon sequestration implies that the total C pool in the soil profile can be increased through managerial interventions aimed at transferring atmospheric CO2 to the soil C pool by moderating organic and/or inorganic transformations, either through humification of photosynthetic biomass or formation of secondary carbonates. The transfer of soil C to the atmospheric pool has created a C deficit in world soils, the so-called “C sink.” This C sink capacity can be filled by conversion to a restorative land use (e.g., reforestation, perennial vegetation cover) and adoption of recommended management practices that create positive C and nutrient budgets, as well as favorable soil temperate and moisture regimes. Over and above its potential to offset anthropogenic emissions, soil C sequestration has numerous benefits related to ecosystem services. Important among these are food security, water quality, and biodiversity. This volume is the second edition of SSSA Special Publication 57, first published in 2001. The present edition is an update of the concepts, processes, properties, practices and the supporting data. All chapters are new contributions by both authors of the first edition and new invited authors. The expanded second edition includes 23 chapters, with a substantial new introduction and concluding chapter. New themes addressed are urban soils, minesoils, biochemically recalcitrant compounds, carbonaceous materials, belowground C storage by woody plants, and peat soils. The geographic focus of the book is North America. While a majority of contributions are from the United States, there are important chapters from Canada and Mexico. Thematically, the second edition encompasses data from modeling, lab analyses, plot studies, landscape assessment, and regional evaluation of soil C pools and fluxes. The second edition of Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect is essential reading for those interested in advancing our efforts to address global warming by understanding the processes, properties, and practices affecting the soil C pool and its dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it