MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1523487694 · doi:10.1515/ans-2012-0101

Liouville Type Theorems for Stable Solutions of Certain Elliptic Systems

2012· preprint· en· W1523487694 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Nonlinear Studies · 2012
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfimum and supremumType (biology)Dimension (graph theory)Bounded functionCombinatoricsLambdaOmegaMathematicsHamiltonian (control theory)Discrete mathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We establish Liouville type theorems for elliptic systems with various classes of nonlinearities on ℝ N . We show, among other things, that a system has no semi-stable solution in any dimension, whenever the infimum of the derivatives of the corresponding non-linearities is positive. We give some immediate applications to various standard systems, such as the Gelfand, and certain Hamiltonian systems. The case where the infimum is zero is more interesting and quite challenging. We show that any C 2 (ℝ N ) positive entire semi-stable solution of the following Lane-Emden system, is necessarily constant, whenever the dimension N < 8 + 3α + , provided p = 1, q ≥ 2 and f (x) = (1 + |x| 2 ) . The same also holds for p = q ≥ 2 provided We also consider the case of bounded domains Ω ⊂ ℝ N , where we extend results of Brown et al. [1] and Tertikas [18] about stable solutions of equations to systems. At the end, we prove a Pohozaev type theorem for certain weighted elliptic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.233
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it