MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1525709766 · doi:10.1109/etfa.1996.573319

Hierarchies of place/transition refinements in Petri nets

2002· article· en· W1525709766 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetri netStructuringComputer scienceAbstractionStochastic Petri netSimple (philosophy)Theoretical computer scienceTransition (genetics)Process architectureDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Place and transition refinements provide a convenient method of structuring complex net models by replacing single elements (places and transitions) at a "higher-level" of abstraction with "lower-level", more detailed, subnets. The concepts of static and dynamic place/transition refinements are introduced. Dynamic refinements do not increase the size of the (refined) model because no "expansion" of the model is performed; instead, only a "logical" association of higher-level elements with lower-level subnets is maintained and used in model analysis. Multiple applications of place/transition refinements results in hierarchical net models. The paper formalizes the concept of hierarchies of refinements in Petri nets and shows simple applications of the hierarchical approach to modeling of manufacturing cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPetri Nets in System ModelingFrench-language works237,207