MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1526373655 · doi:10.1002/dac.2338

Dynamic channel selection with reinforcement learning for cognitive WLAN over fiber

2012· article· en· W1526373655 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Communication Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCognitive radioReinforcement learningComputer networkThroughputCognitive networkWirelessRadio resource managementWireless networkChannel (broadcasting)Wi-FiTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The Internet of Things (IoT) is the next big possibility and challenge for the future information networks. It makes the interaction between people and things more active and provides the connection among different existing networks. Ubiquitous short‐range wireless access and cognitive radio are key technologies for the IoT's realization. This paper deals with some problems in an integrated system of wireless local area network (WLAN) and cognitive radio — cognitive WLAN over fiber (CWLANoF). CWLANoF is a cost‐effective and efficient architecture that combines radio over fiber and cognitive radio technologies to provide centralized radio resource management and equal spectrum access in infrastructure‐based IEEE 802.11 WLANs. In this paper, a reinforcement learning approach is applied to implement dynamic channel selection in CWLANoF. The cognitive access points select the best channels among the industrial, scientific, and medical band for data packet transmission, given that the objective is to minimize external interference and acquire better network‐wide performance. The reinforcement learning method avoids solving complex optimization problems while being able to explore the states of a CWLANoF system during normal operations. Simulation results reveal that the proposed strategy is effective in avoiding aggregated interference, reducing outage probability, and improving network throughput. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it