Spermiogenic Germ Cell Phase—Specific DNA Damage Following Cyclophosphamide Exposure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The production of genetically competent spermatozoa is essential for normal embryo development. The chemotherapeutic drug cyclophosphamide creates cross-links and DNA strand breaks in many cell types, including germ cells. This study assessed the phase specificity of the susceptibility of spermiogenic germ cells to genetic damage induced by cyclophosphamide. Adult male rats were given cyclophosphamide using one of four schedules: 1) high dose/acute- day 1, 100 mg/kg; 2) low dose/subchronic, 4 days-days 1-4, 6.0 mg/kg/d; 3) high dose/subchronic, 4 days-day 1, 100 mg/kg, and days 2-4, 50 mg/kg/d; and 4) low dose/chronic-daily, 6.0 mg/kg/d for 14-28 days. To capture cauda epididymal spermatozoa exposed to cyclophosphamide during late, mid-, and early spermiogenesis, animals were sacrificed on days 14, 21, and 28, respectively. Spermatozoa were analyzed for DNA strand breaks using the comet assay. No dramatic increases in damage were seen after high-dose/acute exposure to cyclophosphamide. Subchronic exposure showed a dose-related increase in DNA damage; maximal damage, as demonstrated by comet tail parameters, was seen after 21 days, reflecting an increased susceptibility of step 9-14 spermatids. Low-dose chronic exposure to cyclophosphamide induced DNA damage, which reached a plateau by day 21. The magnitude of damage at all time points after low-dose chronic exposure was much greater than that following low-dose exposure for 4 days, indicating an accumulation of damage over time. Thus, the DNA damage induced by cyclophosphamide is germ cell phase-specific. The most damaging effects of cyclophosphamide occurred during a key point of sperm chromatin remodeling (histone hyperacetylation and transition protein deposition). We speculate that strand breaks disrupt chromatin remodeling, hence affecting chromatin structure and embryo development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".