Estudio documental (2006-2013) sobre el autocuidado en el día a día del paciente con enfermedad renal crónica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To describe the self-care activities done by the patients who suffer chronic kidney disease (CKD) that are currently receiving different substitutive treatments, reported in scientifi c literature between 2006 and 2013. Materials and method: Qualitative desk study in which original articles of any nationality were reviewed. These articles were published in Spanish, English and Portuguese and they were indexed in the following data bases: Elsevier Instituciones, ScienceDirect, Ciberindex, Nursing@ Ovid, Ebsco Host, Pubmed Scielo and Lilacs. The key words used were self-care, care of one-self, self-management, CKD, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplant. The content analysis was used for the data analysis. Results: Eight articles that corresponded to the study’s objective were selected. Seven of them were from Brazil and one form Canada. Six of them were qualitative and all of the articles were made by nurses. Two of them present, explicitly, disciplinary theoretical orientation. The publication average was one per year. Six categories emerged: Upkeep and improvement in physical aptitude or condition. Upkeep and improvement of nutritional state: Feeding behavior, leisure as a self-care measure. Finally, from experience and building of knowledge: some self-care practices. Conclusions: Upkeep of the physical condition and nutritional state were the self-care activities that appeared with the most relevance. In the scientifi c production on self-care in patients with CKD in substitutive treatments, the leadership of the fi eld of nursery is noticeable but there is low overall production, especially in third world countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.038 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.018 | 0.018 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".