Attribute-oriented induction using domain generalization graphs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attribute-oriented induction summarizes the information in a relational database by repeatedly replacing specific attribute values with more general concepts according to user-defined concept hierarchies. We show how domain generalization graphs can be constructed from multiple concept hierarchies associated with an attribute, describe how these graphs can be used to control the generalization of a set of attributes, and present the Multi-Attribute Generalization algorithm for attribute-oriented induction using domain generalization graphs. Based upon a generate-and-test approach, the algorithm generates all possible combinations of nodes from the domain generalization graphs associated with the individual attributes, to produce all possible generalized relations for the set of attributes. We rant the interestingness of the resulting generalized relations using measures based upon relative entropy and variance. Our experiments show that these measures provide a basis for analyzing summary data from relational databases. Variance appears more useful because it tends to rank the less complex generalized relations (i.e., those with few attributes and/or few tuples) as more interesting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it