MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1529375358 · doi:10.1002/adem.201400084

Biopolymer‐Based Gel Casting of Ferroelectric Ceramics

2014· article· en· W1529375358 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin P. Plucknett, Cameron Munro

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Engineering Materials · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaNova Scotia Department of Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFerroelectricityCeramicCastingTape castingMachiningHomogeneity (statistics)Aqueous suspensionSubtractive colorNanotechnologyAqueous solutionComposite materialMetallurgyComputer scienceOptoelectronicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ferroelectric ceramics have a wide range of industrial applications. While components can be formed through simple ‘press and sinter’ approaches, there is an increasing need for more flexible processing methods. Suspension based forming promotes greater homogeneity, through elimination of processing defects, and allows the formation of more complex shaped components. In the present work, the application of aqueous gel casting technologies is reviewed, and in particular the use of natural biopolymers as gelation aids for such approaches. Recent studies of the application of such technology to complex shape forming of BaTiO3 ferroelectric ceramics are examined. Emphasis is placed upon a simple subtractive rapid prototyping method, utilizing aqueous gel casting in combination with green machining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Engineering MaterialsSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207