MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1529762244 · doi:10.1002/pbc.24777

Neuroblastoma in older children, adolescents and young adults: A report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group project

2013· article· en· W1529762244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersWilliam Guy Forbeck Research FoundationSt. Baldrick's Foundation
KeywordsMedicineNeuroblastomaDiseaseInternal medicineStage (stratigraphy)OncologyProportional hazards modelPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma in older children and adolescents has a distinctive, indolent phenotype, but little is known about the clinical and biological characteristics that distinguish this rare subgroup. Our goal was to determine if an optimal age cut-off exists that defines indolent disease and if accepted prognostic factors and treatment approaches are applicable to older children. PROCEDURE: Using data from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group, among patients ≥18 months old (n = 4,027), monthly age cut-offs were tested to determine the effect of age on survival. The prognostic effect of baseline characteristics and autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) for advanced disease was assessed within two age cohorts; ≥5 to <10 years (n = 730) and ≥10 years (n = 200). RESULTS: Older age was prognostic of poor survival, with outcome gradually worsening with increasing age at diagnosis, without statistical evidence for an optimal age cut-off beyond 18 months. Among patients ≥5 years, factors significantly prognostic of lower event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in multivariable analyses were INSS stage 4, MYCN amplification and unfavorable INPC histology classification. Among stage 4 patients, AHCT provided a significant EFS and OS benefit. Following relapse, patients in both older cohorts had prolonged OS compared to those ≥18 months to <5 years (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite indolent disease and infrequent MYCN amplification, older children with advanced disease have poor survival, without evidence for a specific age cut-off. Our data suggest that AHCT may provide a survival benefit in older children with advanced disease. Novel therapeutic approaches are required to more effectively treat these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it