MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1530069278 · doi:10.1111/bpa.12171

<scp>I</scp>nternational <scp>S</scp>ociety of <scp>N</scp>europathology‐<scp>H</scp>aarlem <scp>C</scp>onsensus <scp>G</scp>uidelines for <scp>N</scp>ervous <scp>S</scp>ystem <scp>T</scp>umor <scp>C</scp>lassification and <scp>G</scp>rading

2014· article· en· W1530069278 on OpenAlexaff
David N. Louis, Arie Perry, Peter C. Burger, David W. Ellison, Guido Reifenberger, Andreas von Deimling, Kenneth Aldape, Daniel J. Brat, V. Peter Collins, Charles G. Eberhart, Dominique Figarella‐Branger, Gregory N. Fuller, Felice Giangaspero, Caterina Giannini, Cynthia Hawkins, Paul Kleihues, Andrey Korshunov, Johan M. Kros, M. Beatriz S. Lopes, Ho‐Keung Ng, Hiroko Ohgaki, Werner Paulus, Torsten Pietsch, Marc K. Rosenblum, Elisabeth J. Rushing, Figen Söylemezoğlu, Otmar D. Wiestler, Pieter Wesseling

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Pathology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersWorld Health Organization
KeywordsNeuropathologyMedical diagnosisMedicineSet (abstract data type)BioinformaticsNeuroscienceComputational biologyComputer sciencePathologyBiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major discoveries in the biology of nervous system tumors have raised the question of how non-histological data such as molecular information can be incorporated into the next World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors. To address this question, a meeting of neuropathologists with expertise in molecular diagnosis was held in Haarlem, the Netherlands, under the sponsorship of the International Society of Neuropathology (ISN). Prior to the meeting, participants solicited input from clinical colleagues in diverse neuro-oncological specialties. The present "white paper" catalogs the recommendations of the meeting, at which a consensus was reached that incorporation of molecular information into the next WHO classification should follow a set of provided "ISN-Haarlem" guidelines. Salient recommendations include that (i) diagnostic entities should be defined as narrowly as possible to optimize interobserver reproducibility, clinicopathological predictions and therapeutic planning; (ii) diagnoses should be "layered" with histologic classification, WHO grade and molecular information listed below an "integrated diagnosis"; (iii) determinations should be made for each tumor entity as to whether molecular information is required, suggested or not needed for its definition; (iv) some pediatric entities should be separated from their adult counterparts; (v) input for guiding decisions regarding tumor classification should be solicited from experts in complementary disciplines of neuro-oncology; and (iv) entity-specific molecular testing and reporting formats should be followed in diagnostic reports. It is hoped that these guidelines will facilitate the forthcoming update of the fourth edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1590.072

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations572
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain PathologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207