MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531525687

Women and sexuality in muslim societies

2004· article· en· W1531525687 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pınar İlkkaracan

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTurkey's Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesSociologyPoliticsHuman sexualityHonourOppressionIslamDissentLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WOMEN AND SEXUALITY IN MUSLIM SOCIETIES Pinar Ilkkaracan, ed. New York: Women for Human Rights (WWHR), 2000; 455 pp. A discussion of women's sexuality in societies begs for compliance with an unspoken convention that requires one to clearly indicate one's political/ideological location in in or the World. I could begin simply by listing well-publicized violence against women that has mobilized many women towards political struggle - forced marriages, violent punishments for sexual expression, and socalled honour killings of wives, sisters, daughters and female cousins. Such an approach may find itself positioned within self-righteous outrage against Islam from conservative forces in West at a time when women's sexual freedom has become an important rhetorical weapon in discursive battle of versus West. On other hand, there appears to be a strategic commitment among progressive academics to contextualize all women's struggles in societies within resurgence of colonial ideas about women's oppression in order to forestall denigration of Islamic culture through deliberate misreadings of women's political activism. Feminist scholars, particularly those associated with Muslim World, must write from an indeterminate location that is neither within the West, nor within Islam. This preferred strategy clears necessary space for drawing attention to other issues that are integral to any discussion of women's sexuality, in fact to overall democratization, in societies such as monopolizing of Islam by patriarchal authoritative voices, compelling need for dissent, discussion and reform within world and undemocratic nature of social, economic and political structures that have become entrenched in most states and communities. It is, therefore, propitious that a Turkey-based women's group has assembled a collection of articles and documents which easily demonstrates that women's sexuality is not simply a pawn in representational battle between Islamic and Eurocentric fundamentalists or between Islamic extremists and moderate Muslims. Women and Sexuality in Societies enables us to argue that politicizing issue of women's sexuality, in its narrow and broader connotations, is both necessary and timely. This book substantiates notion of sexuality as individual woman's to pleasure and, as legitimation of women's uncensored economic, cultural and political participation, needs to be read not simply as bourgeois woman's individualized notion of choice or liberation but as a barometer of relationship between and family, community and nation state. In many societies and particularly in so-called Islamic states, women's sexuality has become a signifier of gendered claims to public space and a definer of separating line between woman and citizen. Thus women's expression of sexuality, through their relationships, dress, deportment, their presence in bazaars, mosques, and streets, their depiction in media, and their writing, is both an issue of bodily integrity of embodied individual-as-woman and right to equal public access and participation of abstract individual-as-citizen. However, in spite of its centrality to women's rights and status, issue of women's sexuality in societies is currently subsumed within struggles for legal and political rights mainly because of personal, social and political consequences of raising an issue which is so culturally tabooed. Therefore, this collection is an important first step. Women and Sexuality in Societies is published by Women for Women's Human Rights (WWHR), a group engaged in struggle for women's sexuality, bodily integrity and violations of women's human rights. The book is a collection of scholarly analysis, research findings, literature, cartoons and anecdotal accounts of female researchers, academics, activists, authors, poets, journalists and caricaturists from different countries. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources for feminist researchSame topicTurkey's Politics and SocietyFrench-language works237,207