MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1533241069 · doi:10.1111/1468-229x.12076

From Tyrant to Unfit Monarch: Marchamont<scp>N</scp>edham's Representation of<scp>C</scp>harles<scp>S</scp>tuart and<scp>R</scp>oyalists during the Interregnum

2015· article· en· W1533241069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistory · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterregnumNewspaperPoliticsRepresentation (politics)Government (linguistics)HistoryClassicsLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Marchamont N edham was one of the most significant E nglish journalists of the seventeenth century. During the Interregnum, his newspaper M ercurius P oliticus routinely printed stories of exiled royalists and their leader C harles S tuart. Although the topic of royalists was consistent throughout the 1650s, the royal image in P oliticus was not. In the early 1650s, N edham described C harles S tuart as a tyrant and enemy of freedom, while after 1651, the exiled king appeared as a failed monarch. N edham's reporting of royalists was independent of government influence, and he himself elected to change his representation of royalists. It was the shifting political situation that convinced him to alter his descriptions of C harles S tuart and his followers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it