Analysis and Characterization of a Wide-Angle Impedance Matching Metasurface for Dipole Phased Arrays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of mutual coupling impact the performance of phased arrays as the beam is scanned off broadside. Wide-angle impedance matching (WAIM) alleviates this problem from a transmission-line impedance matching viewpoint, increasing the useable scan range of the array. Traditionally, a dielectric slab is placed at some distance above the array, resulting in a match at some given angle off broadside. We propose a simpler and more effective solution, replacing the dielectric slab with an ultra-thin metasurface composed of a sheet of split-ring resonators (SRRs) to improve the scanning characteristics of a dipole phased array. It is shown that the presence of the metasurface results in significant improvements in multiple scan planes. A generalized equivalent transmission-line model is introduced for the classical WAIM configuration and adapted for the metasurface. A quasianalytical model based on the equivalent transmission-line model and the extracted scattering parameters of the metasurface properly predicts the scan range of the full structure, and allows for an accelerated design process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it